Skip to content
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTAL ALIENATION
AWARENESS
What is Parental Alienation
The Five Factor Model
17 Alienating Strategies
8 Symptoms of Parental Alienation
EDUCATION
Parental Alienation Conference 2022
Clinical & Legal Aspects of PA – Report Writing
Post Graduate Award in Parental Alienation Studies
Understanding, Assessment & Intervention Training Seminar
FREE Parental Alienation Reference Material Database
Training For Parents
Training Portal
Dr Ludwig F. Lowenstein M.A., Dip. Psych., Ph.D.
Case note on Pisica v the Republic of Moldova
Part 1: Case note on Pisica v the Republic of Moldova
Part 2: Case Note on Pisică v the Republic of Moldova
INTERVENTION
Psychological Support
ONE VOICE
About Us
Work With Us
Media
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTAL ALIENATION
AWARENESS
What is Parental Alienation
The Five Factor Model
17 Alienating Strategies
8 Symptoms of Parental Alienation
EDUCATION
Parental Alienation Conference 2022
Clinical & Legal Aspects of PA – Report Writing
Post Graduate Award in Parental Alienation Studies
Understanding, Assessment & Intervention Training Seminar
FREE Parental Alienation Reference Material Database
Training For Parents
Training Portal
Dr Ludwig F. Lowenstein M.A., Dip. Psych., Ph.D.
Case note on Pisica v the Republic of Moldova
Part 1: Case note on Pisica v the Republic of Moldova
Part 2: Case Note on Pisică v the Republic of Moldova
INTERVENTION
Psychological Support
ONE VOICE
About Us
Work With Us
Media
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTAL ALIENATION
AWARENESS
What is Parental Alienation
The Five Factor Model
17 Alienating Strategies
8 Symptoms of Parental Alienation
EDUCATION
Parental Alienation Conference 2022
Clinical & Legal Aspects of PA – Report Writing
Post Graduate Award in Parental Alienation Studies
Understanding, Assessment & Intervention Training Seminar
FREE Parental Alienation Reference Material Database
Training For Parents
Training Portal
Dr Ludwig F. Lowenstein M.A., Dip. Psych., Ph.D.
Case note on Pisica v the Republic of Moldova
Part 1: Case note on Pisica v the Republic of Moldova
Part 2: Case Note on Pisică v the Republic of Moldova
INTERVENTION
Psychological Support
ONE VOICE
About Us
Work With Us
Media
Search for:
Part 1 of Case Note on Pisică v the Republic of Moldova
Brendan Guildea
2020-01-28T13:02:14+00:00
Brendan Timeline
Sorry,You have not added any story yet
Brendan Timeline
2017
06/06/2017
P complained to the DSAFP that NG was not interested in rebuilding her relationship with the children, stating that she had only come to their school once every two months, for thirty minutes each time.
05/05/2017
Government of Moldova notified of the application.
16/03/2017
P brings files her ECHR application.
06/02/2017
A psychologist issued a conclusion concerning the state of mind of the children, who were at that time with P’s parents owing to a protection order preventing him from contacting his children. The psychologist found that all three children had been seriously affected by the separation from their father as a result of the protection order, and that any action aimed at rebuilding their relationship with their mother would be premature, as the children were displaying clear signs of resistance against their mother, who was associated with the “loss” of their father. In the weeks that followed, the reconciliation procedure between NG and P continued, with the involvement of a number of officials. Three meetings between various authorities took place on 7, 14 and 17 February 2017, aimed at identifying solutions for enforcing the judgment of 24 June 2015.
03/02/2017
The local police and the mayor’s office repeat their request of 27 January.
27/01/2017
The local police and the mayor’s office asked NG to show more interest in the children’s psychological state. While they acknowledged that NG was unable to establish contact with them, she was blamed for refusing any form of cooperation, which prevented the mayor’s office from adopting any relevant decision. At the same time, P was not allowed to approach the children and she was the only legal guardian. She was urged to “assume her share of the responsibility”, as the only person able to offer the children protection at that time.
18/01/2017
The court rejected the bailiff’s request for permission to forcibly enter P’s house on the grounds that, as a matter of law a bailiff already has unrestricted access to P’s house.
17/01/2017
Adjourned date of criminal prosecution against P.
2016
19/12/2016
Another attempt to enforce the judgment failed, owing to the children being opposed to living with their mother.
17/12/2016
The deputy mayor of the village where the children lived (who was acting as a guardian local authority) ordered that the three children be placed with their paternal grandparents (P’s parents) on an emergency basis for a period of 72 hours. He subsequently extended the order for the children’s placement with their grandparents for a period of up to 45 days.
Page 2 of 8
«
1
2
3
…
8
»
Page load link
Go to Top